We use cookies and website technologies to customize information and improve your shopping experience all around whisky. We use technically necessary cookies to ensure the general functionality and features of our website. With your consent we also use cookies and iframes of third party providers to present our social media content to you and make use of functional tracking and analysis tools to identify errors and continually improve your user experience.
I just had a bottle of Laphroaig "Select" delivered and not only was it the same colour as the 10 year old (Normally "Select" is a pale straw colour, due to no caramel), but the nose, the taste, I'd swear it's a mislabeled bottle of 10 yr old.
I've been drinking the 10 year old for over 15 years, it's not like I don't know what it tastes like!
But my question is this: What do you think is more likely A: A mislabeled bottle of 10 year old or B: They've run low on stock for the latest batch of "Select" and put a ton more of the 10 yr into the mix.
Not complaining, as I acutally prefer the 10 yr old.
Okay, forget that....
I got a bottle of 10 yr old for comparison and it seems it was just a unusally pungent batch of select.
I feel a bit silly now.
@James_Jackson I've always found with Laphroaig that the differences in the releases become a lot more apparent once the bottle has been open for a couple of weeks (same applies to a lot of peat heavy whiskies). A bit of oxidation will probably change it enough that you'll see even more difference between them.